CountyCaseField Ledger contour markCountyCase
Mifflin County, Pennsylvania context mapThe county is outlined and labeled within PA using 2025 Census TIGER geometry.Mifflin County
Census TIGER/Line 2025 county geometry.

Reported crash flags

9.8%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged drinking driver, 2016-2025

n=400 · window 2016-2025

well above possibly well above the state share

95% range: 8.9%–10.7%
4.1%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged drugged driver, 2016-2025

n=166 · window 2016-2025

well above possibly well above the state share

95% range: 3.5%–4.7%
14.2%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged distracted, 2016-2025

n=582 · window 2016-2025

well above possibly well above the state share

95% range: 13.2%–15.4%
47.6%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged aggressive driving, 2016-2025

n=1943 · window 2016-2025

below below the state share

25.6%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged speeding related, 2016-2025

n=1044 · window 2016-2025

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 24.2%–26.9%
19.3%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged mature driver, 2016-2025

n=790 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 18.2%–20.6%
21.4%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged young driver, 2016-2025

n=876 · window 2016-2025

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 20.2%–22.7%
6.6%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged deer related, 2016-2025

n=270 · window 2016-2025

well above possibly well above the state share

95% range: 5.9%–7.4%
0.8%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged work zone, 2016-2025

n=34 · window 2016-2025

well below possibly well below the state share

95% range: 0.6%–1.2%
0.4%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged school zone, 2016-2025

n=15 · window 2016-2025

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 0.2%–0.6%

Keep in view: These reported-crash flags can overlap and do not measure how often individual drivers engage in a behavior or establish why a crash happened.

Crash severity

12.2

Share of reported crashes that were fatal: 12.2 per 1,000, 2016-2025

n=50 · window 2016-2025

well above possibly well above the state rate

95% range: 9.1–16.1
15.4%

Suspected-serious share of the source-defined reported-crash injury universe, 2016-2025

n=273 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state share

Keep in view: The share of reported crashes that were fatal does not measure a county's danger, a traveler's risk, or the cause of any crash.

Fatal-crash timing

26.9%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were night, 2015-2024

n=14 · window 2015-2024

below somewhat below the state share

95% range: 16.8%–40.3%
34.6%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were weekend, 2015-2024

n=18 · window 2015-2024

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 23.2%–48.2%
26.9%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were impaired involved, 2015-2024

n=14 · window 2015-2024

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 16.8%–40.3%

Keep in view: These time and involvement shares describe fatal crashes in FARS and do not measure an individual's risk or establish why a crash occurred.

Truck-crash context

1.08

Truck-crash share relative to overall reported-crash share, 2015-2023

n=258 · window 2015-2023

near broadly near the state level

95% range: 0.96–1.23

Keep in view: This location quotient compares shares of reported crashes and does not measure truck-driver fault, carrier safety, or roadway danger.

Source notices