CountyCaseField Ledger contour markCountyCase
Pike County, Pennsylvania context mapThe county is outlined and labeled within PA using 2025 Census TIGER geometry.Pike County
Census TIGER/Line 2025 county geometry.

Reported crash flags

7.7%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged drinking driver, 2016-2025

n=395 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 7.0%–8.5%
3.0%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged drugged driver, 2016-2025

n=152 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 2.5%–3.5%
10.2%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged distracted, 2016-2025

n=524 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 9.4%–11.1%
51.5%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged aggressive driving, 2016-2025

n=2642 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 50.1%–52.8%
32.0%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged speeding related, 2016-2025

n=1641 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state share

17.7%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged mature driver, 2016-2025

n=909 · window 2016-2025

near near the state share

17.7%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged young driver, 2016-2025

n=910 · window 2016-2025

near near the state share

10.7%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged deer related, 2016-2025

n=549 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state share

3.4%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged work zone, 2016-2025

n=174 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state share

0.6%

Share of PennDOT reported crashes flagged school zone, 2016-2025

n=29 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state share

Keep in view: These reported-crash flags can overlap and do not measure how often individual drivers engage in a behavior or establish why a crash happened.

Crash severity

14.6

Share of reported crashes that were fatal: 14.6 per 1,000, 2016-2025

n=75 · window 2016-2025

well above well above the state rate

8.5%

Suspected-serious share of the source-defined reported-crash injury universe, 2016-2025

n=192 · window 2016-2025

near broadly near the state share

95% range: 7.4%–9.7%

Keep in view: The share of reported crashes that were fatal does not measure a county's danger, a traveler's risk, or the cause of any crash.

Fatal-crash timing

38.0%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were night, 2015-2024

n=27 · window 2015-2024

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 27.6%–49.7%
39.4%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were weekend, 2015-2024

n=28 · window 2015-2024

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 28.9%–51.1%
31.0%

Share of FARS fatal crashes that were impaired involved, 2015-2024

n=22 · window 2015-2024

above somewhat above the state share

95% range: 21.4%–42.5%

Keep in view: These time and involvement shares describe fatal crashes in FARS and do not measure an individual's risk or establish why a crash occurred.

Truck-crash context

1.10

Truck-crash share relative to overall reported-crash share, 2015-2023

n=333 · window 2015-2023

above somewhat above the state level

95% range: 0.99–1.23

Keep in view: This location quotient compares shares of reported crashes and does not measure truck-driver fault, carrier safety, or roadway danger.

Long-run trajectory

470

Annual Reportable Crashes, 2025

n=470 · window 2025
73.4

Annual Crash Index (2006=100), 2025

n=470 · window 2025

well below possibly well below the state index

95% range: 65.2–82.7
80

Crash Index (2006=100), 2020

n=512 · window 2020

below somewhat below the state index

95% range: 71.2–89.9
71.3

Mean Recovery Index, 2021-2025

n=2283 · window 2021-2025

well below possibly well below the state index

95% range: 65.4–77.9
8.1

Mean Absolute County-State Index Gap, 2006-2025

n=640 · window 2006-2025

near near the state level

Keep in view: An indexed trajectory compares reported-crash counts with a county's own 2006 base and does not measure safety, danger, or individual risk.

Source notices